All workConnected screens · real-time software

PROJECT 03 / Active development

Telecastt

One host. More screens.

My role
Product design & software development
Focus
React, TypeScript, Node.js & WebRTC
Read the project story
Telecastt

One host.
More screens.

Two regions of the same desktop.New browser-tiling drawing · no native monitor is added.Compare the complete view and its regions
The original Telecastt identity beside a new drawing of one host and two browser regions. It explains tiling; this page connects to no device. Native display extension remains experimental.Open the original Telecastt artwork

What if another screen was already sitting on your desk?

A spare laptop already has a display and a browser. Telecastt explores how that device can become a companion screen through WebRTC, receiving a mirrored or tiled view of a host desktop.

The product question is also an interface question: how do people recognise the host, understand a companion’s state and recover when the session changes? My focus is making that relationship legible without asking someone to understand the transport behind it.

Use the displays you already have.

02 / THE APPROACHTHE SCREEN-SHARING WORKFLOW

From host to companion.

  1. 01

    Host

    Begin with a clear source: the desktop content being shared and the session it belongs to.

  2. 02

    Connect

    Give each companion a recognisable connection state, with a clear way to join or return.

  3. 03

    Display

    Make the relationship between the full desktop and a tiled region understandable on the receiving screen.

  4. 04

    Interact

    Keep control state visible, especially when an input session ends or a companion disconnects.

Make the session understandable.

Each companion receives its own WebRTCWebRTCA browser technology for sending media and data between peers. In this project, it carries a host’s screen view to a browser companion; the Windows host companion handles returned input. connection. Mirroring shares the desktop; tiling assigns an existing desktop region. Tiling does not create another operating-system monitor.

As the number of screens grows, connection state becomes part of the composition. The host needs an overview; each companion needs a clear sense of its own role. A useful interface should answer what is being shown, where it comes from and what happens when the connection changes.

One desktop.
Two ways to share it.

Keep the whole view, or give each companion its own frame.

One existing host desktop

Mirror

Companion 1Complete desktop

Companion 2Complete desktop

Inspect the shared content

Each companion receives this whole composition. Its proportions stay the same, with unused space above and below on a taller screen.

Companions 1 & 2 · complete desktop

The same vector composition, enlarged for inspection. The full arrangement remains above; close this fold to return to it.

Tile

Companion 1Left region

Companion 2Right region

Inspect the shared content

The two views meet at the centre of one host desktop. Neither region is stretched to fill the other.

Companion 1 · left region
Companion 2 · right region

The same vector composition, enlarged for inspection. The full arrangement remains above; close this fold to return to it.

Host screenBrowser companions

Mouse · keyboard · text clipboardWindows host companion

Mirror. Both browser companions receive the same, complete view of the existing host desktop.

Tile. Each browser companion receives a different region of that desktop. No operating-system monitor is added.

Mouse, keyboard and text clipboard input return through the Windows host companion.

What a connection changes

Two paths have to be understood together: the view leaving the host, and supported input returning to it.

  1. HostCompanion

    Disconnected

    No shared view is arriving, and there is no active remote input path.

    Start with a recognised host and the intended session. An old picture on a screen does not establish a current connection.

  2. HostCompanion

    Joining

    Session information is being exchanged. The request is still distinct from an established stream.

    Show that the connection is pending. If it cannot be established, return to the host and session details rather than labelling the companion connected.

  3. HostCompanion

    Connected

    The host’s screen travels to the browser companion. Supported input returns through the Windows host companion.

    Keep the source, assigned view and input ownership visible together. A connection state describes the channel; it does not add a native operating-system monitor.

If the connection is lost. Treat the shared view and remote input as unavailable until a new connection is established. Reconfirm the host, session and assigned region before returning to the arrangement.

A new explanation of session states. These drawings are visible together; this page connects to no device and does not measure a connection’s quality or recovery.

New layout study; not a running Telecastt session. Native virtual-display extension remains experimental.

Shared bandwidth
The repository describes adaptive bitrate and frame rate per companion, within a shared host budget.
A readable session
The design priority is continuity: joining, reconnecting and leaving should feel like states of the same session, with understandable feedback.

Be precise about the experience.

The Windows companion handles mouse, keyboard and text clipboard input. Rich clipboard content and broader platform support are separate development work. Default signalling uses plain WebSocket; a hosted deployment needs its transport and access configuration reviewed before use.

An interface should state its limits as clearly as its capabilities. A mirrored view, a tiled desktop region and a native extended display are different experiences. The product language needs to preserve those distinctions, so someone can judge whether the current version fits their setup.

Active development

An open development project.

The public repository describes browser mirroring, tiling, adaptive quality and Windows host interaction. Native virtual-display extension remains experimental, with separate driver requirements. The portfolio does not present the project as a released or production-verified application.

Return to the reasoning.

  1. Browser companion displays

    The arrangement study: one source, mirrored or tiled views.

  2. WebRTC connection architecture

    The host-to-companion relationship described in the case.

  3. Host interaction and adaptive quality

    The input path and its boundaries; no device is connected here.

Follow its development.

Follow the repository for the current feature set, setup instructions, and development status.

Explore the repository